Charles I on his visit to Edinburgh in
1633 |
Charles was the second son of James
VI and was born at Dunfermline on 19 November 1600. He
became the heir apparent in 1612 when his brother Henry died.
He succeeded his father on 27 March 1625 and in 1626 he was
married to Henrietta Maria, daughter of Henry IV of France.
Although Charles was largely divorced from Scottish affairs,
having been living at the English court since 1604, he still
thought well of the country of his birth. One contemporary
wrote 'he was always an immoderate lover of the Scottish nation,
having not only bene born ther, but educated by that people
and besiedged by them always'. The Privy Council in Edinburgh
did not sympathise with, or understand, Charles' motives,
however. During the first six years of his reign he was wholly
concerned with English affairs and had no time for the problems
of Scotland.
The early years of Charles' reign
were deceptively calm, and this was destroyed by his religious
policies. One of his first measures was an Act of Revocation,
this annulled all gifts made since 1540 of properties which
the crown could claim. This included the vast ecclesiastical
revenues which had fallen into lay hands before and after
the Reformation. The main reason for this Act was to reduce
the power of the nobility and provide adequate stipends for
the clergy but it also caused a more widespread fear about
the security of property. |
Episcopal government had been revived by James, but with Charles
episcopacy was an article of faith, and he treated the bishops with
a veneration which few of his subjects would have agreed with. The
prelates achieved high office and they had a lot of influence in
the Council of Parliament which caused much resentment. Charles
was responsible for the restoration of many cathedrals and of the
abbey church at Holyrood, where he was crowned in 1633. In
1637 he insisted on the acceptance of the new Prayer Book which
had received praise from liturgical experts but was considered popish
by many Scots and even John Spotiswoode
thought it best to 'lay aside that book'. Others, like Alexander
Henderson, actively opposed the Prayer Book and this led directly
to the National Covenant. He was also losing popularity through
very high taxation levels and in Edinburgh he had insisted on the
building of an expensive new Parliament House and the reconstruction
of St Giles as a cathedral for a new bishopric. The introduction
of the Prayer Book caused a riot at St Giles on 23 July 1637 which
soon led to widespread and organised agitation. The
various grievances against Charles coalesced into the National Covenant
of 1638. This Covenant professed loyalty to the crown but asked
for a return to ecclesiastical and constitutional practice as it
was before Charles' reforms. Charles was an
obstinate man and the Covenanters soon went further than their original
aims, a clash now became inevitable. Not everybody supported the
National Covenant by any means, however, and John
Forbes, Professor of Divinity at King's College, Aberdeen, wrote
a tract opposing it.
A General Assembly met in November 1638, with Alexander
Henderson as Moderator, in Glasgow and it was decided to abolish
Episcopal government. This led to a military confrontation but the
kings forces were no match for experienced Scottish veterans and
the government army refused to fight. A temporary peace was arranged
at Berwick in June 1639 but by now Charles had alienated his English
subjects as much as his Scottish.
Inevitably the peace did not last and a second
bishops war started in 1640 in which the king all but capitulated.
The Covenanters under Alexander Leslie invaded England and occupied
Newcastle. At Ripon they agreed to go no further on the proviso
that they were were given £850 a day in maintenance payments.
Charles journeyed to Scotland in 1641 and gave way to all the Scottish
demands, including a Triennial Act which ensured that a parliament
would meet every three years, whether called by the king or not.
The clerical estate was abolished and all royal officers were to
be appointed in consultation with parliament. The Committee of the
Three Estates held real power and under Presbyterian rule church
attendance became compulsory and dissenters were persecuted.
| In 1642 the English Civil
War broke out and the Scots were split as to which side to support
with the Privy Council urging support for the king and Committee
of the Assembly (calling themselves Conservators of the Peace)
favouring the Roundheads. It was the Solemn
League and Covenant which called for a single Presbyterian church
from the Orkneys to the Isle of Wight that decided the issue,
the Scots abandoned the king. However, the Earl of Montrose
had left the Covenanters and was now fighting well for the Royalists.
His run of victories came to an end at the battle of Philiphaugh
in 1645 where the Covenanters took their revenge, they slaughtered
the women and children who followed the Montrose army and hung
many others involved in the battle. |

The National Covenant of 1638 |
By late 1645 the New Model Army had won
in the south and Charles decided to flee, he gave himself up at
Leslie's camp outside Newark. The Scots were in an impossible situation
for they wanted both king and Covenant, and could not have both.
In the end they took the king to Newcastle and left him with the
English. While in English hands Charles was captured by the Levellers
whom he quickly escaped from and fled to the Isle of Wight. There
he signed the Engagement whereby England was to try Presbyterianism
for three years, the army was to be disbanded and extremist sects
were to be put down. The Scots were to provide military aid and
Royalist risings were planned for several English areas.
This proved to be a disaster as the English uprisings were quickly
put down and the Scottish army was heavily defeated near Preston.
In Scotland the Engagers had been scattered in south west Scotland
by the 'Whiggamore Raid' and this left the Presbyterians in control
again.
Charles was tried by Cromwell on 30 January
1649 and sentenced to death. Although Charles declared the court
illegal he was still executed and this annoyed the Scots greatly.
Although Charles had been the king of England, he was king of Scotland
as well and he had been tried and executed without any consultation
with the Scots. It was a sign of things to come. |
History Books on this time period:
| Author |
Title |
Published |
Price |
Order
Now From: From: |
| Donaldson, G. |
Scotland: James V - VII |
1965 |
£16.99
or
$27.00 |
Amazon.co.uk
or
Amazon.com |
The four-volume Edinburgh History of Scotland
is the most important project in Scottish historical writing
for more than half a century; each volume is written by
an expert on the period who brings to his work the direct
acquaintance with original sources on which authoritative
historical writing can alone be based.
This, the third volume, deals with the time when many
of the most significant and familiar episodes in Scottish
history took place. The period was one in which Scotland
was transformed, partly as a result of conspicuous events
but largely because of more subtle and less perceptible
changes in the constitutional, ecclesiastical and economic
structure, the end result of which was an emergence of
life more akin to that we know today.
Since the early years of the 20th century much research
has been done into this period. Its results form the foundation
of this major work, which makes available information
hitherto only found scattered throughout numerous books
and periodicals. |
 |
|
| Mitchison, R. |
Lordship to Patronage: Scotland 1603-1745 |
1990 |
£9.95
or
$20.00 |
Amazon.co.uk
or
Amazon.com |
Drawing on political, constitutional, religious, economic
and social studies, Professor Mitchison outlines the growing
bonds between England and Scotland, beginning with James
VI's succession and culminating in the Act of Union in
1707.
She argues that the union of the two states has had a
distorting effect on Scottish history, constantly prompting
comparisons of the constitutions and achievements of the
two countries, rather than placing Scotland in a European
context. This book attempts to redress the balance.
First published as part of the New History of Scotland
series this is a highly readable and straightforward introduction
to early modern Scotland. |
 |
|
|