|
|
The Act of Union (1707) |
There had already been several
schemes for the uniting of Scotland and England during the
17th century, these occurred in 1606, 1667, 1670 and 1689
but on every occasion they failed. From the English point
of view there was little to be gained in a union and the Scots
did not wish to become the minor partner who would probably
be swallowed up by the much larger England.
In fact it was the English who had a change of heart first.
They were at war with France, yet again, and Louis XIV recognised
the Catholic James VIII, 'the Young Pretender', as the rightful
heir to both the English and Scottish thrones. The English
would not have this. By the Act of Settlement it was decided
that if Queen Anne should die childless, her only son had
died in 1701, then the crown would pass to Sophia of Hanover,
a cousin of Charles I. The Scots refused to agree to this
and passed a series of acts that were hostile to England.
The most important of these was the Act of Security in which
the Scottish Parliament would have the power to nominate a
successor to Anne within 20 days of her death and that the
successor did not necessarily have to be from the House of
Hanover. This raised the possibility of a separate Scottish
monarchy, and also it raised the spectre of the Auld Alliance
again, this worried England greatly. Scottish soldiers were
important in the army and the English were embroiled in the
War of Spanish Succession. Anne did not immediately sign the
Act of Security and the Scottish Parliament withheld the supply
of Scottish soldiers until she backed down. |

The Treaty of Union is presented to Queen Anne
|
By 1704 Scotland was moving towards more independence rather than
union while Anne and her English government were trying to bring
the two countries closer together. The English moved first by putting
pressure on Scotland with the Alien Act of 1705. In this Act the
Scots were given until Christmas Day to accept the Hanoverian succession
or they were to appoint commissioners to negotiate a union. If neither
action was taken Scots would be treated as aliens in England, threatening
property held by Scots there, and trade with England and her colonies
would be destroyed. Money suddenly became available to Scottish
MP's to support union. In a poorly attended Scottish Parliament
it was decided to appoint the commissioners to negotiate a union.
The discussions began in April 1706 and were largely completed by
July. Although there were huge protests when the terms of the union
were published it was passed by a large majority by the Scottish
Parliament on 16th January 1707. By the terms of the Act Scotland
and England were to become one country. Anne became Queen of Great
Britain and the throne passed to the House of Hanover on her death.
There was also economic union with free trade on both sides of the
border. Scotland was given only 45 seats in the House of Commons
and 16 seats in the House of Lords. What can only be described as
a bribe of £398,085-10s English pounds was paid by England as compensation
for Scotland now taking on part of England's national debt. It was
also intended to repay those who had lost money investing in the
Darien scheme, which failed partly due
to English interference. Scotland was to keep its legal system and
Kirk.
On 28th April 1707 the last Scottish Parliament (until 1999) was
dissolved by the last Scottish monarch.
Already in 1708 the agreements of the union
were beginning to be broken by the English. The Scottish Privy Council
was abolished which left Scotland with little in the way of national
administration. Following this other Acts were introduced which
fed Scottish fears that their country was becoming a poor northern
cousin of powerful England. The same treason laws were introduced
in both countries, this was an obvious interference in the Scottish
legal system. In 1712 the Toleration Act was introduced allowing
greater freedom to Scottish Episcopalians. The
Patronage Act was also introduced in 1712 which reversed the abolition
of patrongae which had occured in 1690. By this Act the selection
of ministers to the Church was decided by the nobles and the Crown,
in practice this Act caused a great deal of friction between the
Church and the Crown. The Board of Trustees
for Fisheries and Manufactures was set up in 1727 and included gentlemen,
lawyers and merchants. It was given a budget of £6000 a year with
which it was to promote growth in the Scottish economy, the budget
was tiny and the Board overextended itself from the beginning. By
1724 and 1736 there were anti-English riots in Edinburgh and Glasgow.
|

History Books on the Eighteenth Century and the events
leading to, and after, the Union:
| Author |
Title |
Published |
Price |
Order
Now From: |
| Brown, K. M. |
Kingdom or Province?: Scotland and the Regal
Union, 1603-1715 |
1992 |
£14.50 |
Amazon.co.uk |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Devine & Young |
Eighteenth Century Scotland |
|
£16.99 |
Amazon.co.uk |
Based on a two-year seminar series at the Research Centre
in Scottish History at the University of Strathclyde,
this text aims to illuminate the part played by 18th century
history in the creation of modern Scotland. It contains
original research and historiographical overviews and
commentaries. |
|
|
| Ferguson, W. |
Scotland's Relations with England: A Survey
to 1707 |
1994 |
£12.99 |
Amazon.co.uk |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Harvie, |
Scotland & Nationalism 3rd Edition |
1997 |
£15.99
or
$26.95 |
Amazon.co.uk
or
Amazon.com
|
| This new edition brings Scotland and Nationalism entirely
up-to-date (1997). In particular the lead up to and implications
of the 1997 referendum are analysed, together with the
development of nationalist feeling in a wider context. |
|
|
History Books on this time period
| Author |
Title |
Published |
Price |
Order
Now From: |
| Cooke, A. (ed.) |
Modern Scottish History: 1707 to the Present |
1998 |
£14.99 |
Amazon.co.uk |
Part of a distance-learning history of Scotland course
running from January 1998. The successful completion of
the course gives students the equivalent to Junior Honours/OU
Level 3 and carries 60 SCOTCAT points. This second volume
covers the period 1850 to the present. |
|
|
| Devine, T. M. |
The Scottish Nation 1700
- 2000 |
2000 |
£9.99
or
$20.00 |
Amazon.co.uk
or
Amazon.com |
| A paperback edition of one of the best-received books
to be published about Scottish history for many years,
written by one our most prestigious historians. A look
at the factors which have shaped and defined modern Scotland. |
 |
|
| Ferguson, W. |
Scotland: 1689 - Present |
1968 |
£15.99 |
Amazon.co.uk |
The four-volume Edinburgh History of Scotland
is the most important project in Scottish historical writing
for more than half a century; each volume is written by
an expert on the period who brings to his work the direct
acquaintance with original sources on which authoritative
historical writing can alone be based.
This, the fourth volume, originally covered the history
of Scotland from the Revolution of 1689 to 1967. The paperback
edition was updated to include a brief review of the ten
years to 1977. Political, ecclesiastical, economic, social
and cultural developments all receive consideration, and
the interaction of these factors is stressed throughout.
But the treatment varies. For the 18th century, separate
chapters are devoted to specific themes, thus enabling
the reader to appreciate the background to ecclesiastical,
social and economic movements. Then, on the ground so
established, after 1832 the various factors at work in
any given period are synthesised in a unified narrative.
The result is the most comprehensive and substantial volume
on modern Scotland. It incorporates the findings of recent
research, including the author's own work, and challenges
many accepted verdicts. The book is fully referenced and,
as a guide to further reading, has a detailed critical
bibliography.v |
 |
|
| Mitchison, R. |
Lordship to Patronage: Scotland 1603-1745 |
1990 |
£9.95
or
$20.00 |
Amazon.co.uk
or
Amazon.com
|
Drawing on political, constitutional, religious, economic
and social studies, Professor Mitchison outlines the growing
bonds between England and Scotland, beginning with James
VI's succession and culminating in the Act of Union in
1707.
She argues that the union of the two states has had a
distorting effect on Scottish history, constantly prompting
comparisons of the constitutions and achievements of the
two countries, rather than placing Scotland in a European
context. This book attempts to redress the balance.
First published as part of the New History of Scotland
series this is a highly readable and straightforward introduction
to early modern Scotland. |
 |
|
| Lenman, B. |
Integration, Enlightenment and Industrialization:
Scotland 1746-1832 |
1993 |
£9.95
or
$20.00 |
Amazon.co.uk
or
Amazon.com
|
This is a study of Scottish politics and society from
the defeat of the last Jacobite rebellion at Culloden
in 1746 to the passing into law of the Scottish Reform
Bill in July 1832. It is a period when the Scottish Enlightenment
reached and perhaps passed its peak, but if the earlier
decades saw the rise of some of the most influential thinkers
of the contemporary world, the latter part of of the period
saw a flourishing of imaginative literature. Economically,
the period saw quite unprecedented changes in the lowlands.
In the Highlands the transformation produced by integration
with more advanced areas of the British Isles proved incompatible
with an ancient culture and way of life.
First published in 1981 as part of The New History of
Scotland series, Bruce P. Lenman's highly readable account
catches the hey-day of the Ancien Regime in Scotland. |
 |
|
| Whatley, Christopher A. |
Bought and Sold for English Gold? : Explaining
the Union of 1707 |
2001 |
£7.99
or
$12.95 |
Amazon.co.uk
or
Amazon.com
|
| Bought and Sold for English Gold? is a new, revised
edition of this invaluable guide to the background to
and causes of the Union of 1707 which, outside Parliament,
was deeply unpopular in Scotland. Extended and rewritten
in the light of the re-establishment of a Scottish Parliament
in 1999, the book takes the reader through the maze of
competing arguments about why Scots gave up their Parliament
in the first place. Christopher Whatley's account is dispassionate
but also lucid, highly readable and frank in its assessments.
Importantly, the book views the Union not only from the
Scottish perspective, but also from that of England. It
also considers the context of Europe, where political
unions were by no means unusual by the early eighteenth
century. |
 |
|
|
|